Thanks for the compliment.
There can be different viable farming system. The most important is to review thoroughly all parameters, environmental as well as financial and as well short as long term, before making a decision.
Further, it has been written nowhere that we have to farm everything. We must limit ourselves to what we can manage properly.

It would seem to me that the commercially viable fish farming method would be land based in areas with mild climate.

This would limit the species that could be farmed but modern advertising can sell almost anything I suppose.

Bob

Mesopotamian’s civilization with multi cities having finest cultural and literature achievements crumbled during 2300BC due to high toxic land unfit to agriculture. Between 1500-1000BC Indus valley civilization comprising two cities Harappa and Mohenjo-daro with more than 100 cities and villages were highly civilized knowing scripts of more than 250 characters. Rivalries and devastation by flood weakened this civilization; later invaded by Ancient Aryans. Ancient Mayan’s civilization was the first to introduce accurate calendar, mathematics and astronomy. This developed society gradually ended due to rivalries, converting crop lands to inspiring temples, complexes, and homes, diseases and viruses. The Plagues of Egypt (absolute astronomy.com) Archeology and natural explanation – The Egyptian Ipuwer Papyrus is a single surviving papyrus holding an ancient Egyptian poem, called The Admonitions of Ipuweror The Dialogue of Ipuwer and the Lord of All…. describes a series of calamities befalling Egypt, including a river turned to blood, men behaving as wild ibises, and the land generally turned upside down. However, this is usually thought to describe a general and long term ecological disaster lasting for a period of decades, such as that which destroyed the old kingdom.

Disrupted natural resources accounted falling of major civilizations. Major factor of each civilization’s disintegration was devastating agriculture land and ecological disaster. Most civilizations neglected the role of rivers when reached to modern growth. The situation applies to our modern world too as most of world river water unused end up in sea. Forests are converted to agricultural land, and agricultural land to urban cities, rising population and consumption of fuel, industrial commodities mounting up pollution for species. Anarchy formed by heavy urbanization and urban industrialization and so on.

For chicken nuggets, though, where you’re dealing with a “meat slurry” already, I think this process would at least make life less torturous (albeit non-existent) for the chickens. Considering that it would be constructed from the cells of a chicken that existed long ago, You could say that you’re eating the “ghost of a chicken.”

This is where the triple bottom line is quite useful. Yet, this approach requires a longer term view on the business and the willingness to accept a possible lower short-term performance if the longer term outcome is better. All you need is a strong CEO who can convince its shareholders and stakeholders of the long-term advantage. Let’s not forget that money always talks in the end, and that sometimes short-term pressures may weaken the relevance of the long-term vision.

Thanks for your comment. Probably what differentiates a “true” value chain from a more regular commercial relationship is the openness between the partners about the value they respectively create and their willingness to share that value fairly. This goes beyond that just commercial negotiation.